Thursday, 8 October 2015

Evaluation

Evaluation:

What worked well and why?
when filming the different types of shots we managed to film some good footage. This meant that when it came to editing the finished piece did look quite professional. we managed to edit together a crabbing shot of Jack switching to a medium shot of Alannah, then back to Jack as he entered the room. This made the footage look more professional as during the convocation they had, we managed to edit the footage to make three different takes of one convocation looks like a continuous convocation with three different shots in it.





What didn't work and why?
When editing the footage we realised that we had forgotten to film the close-up and other shots that weren't on the storyboard. This in turn had downgraded the quality of our work as we had missed out and changed the majority of our story board. Also we didn't film enough footage. This meant that when it came to editing we did not have much footage in the final piece.


What can be improved for next time?
Next time i think that to improve we need to make sure that if are to change the shots around when filming then we should make those changes to the story board to make it easier for the examiner to understand. Also we should film some more footage so that when we come to editing we have more footage then just over 30 seconds.

1 comment:

  1. Avoid text only posts - use screengrabs of your prelim task to illustrate your points.

    ReplyDelete